The Road to Critical Pedagogy

For my multimedia reflection assessment I chose to create a sketchnote summarizing the key points from the HybridPod- Questioning Learning podcast by Chris Friend and Amy Collier. I decided to draw the background of my sketchnote by hand.  I also printed out some cartoon images (to make up for my lack of artistic skills), which I then glued onto my sketchnote and coloured in. I used my sketchnote to outline the key ideas that I will further describe below.

Amy Collier starts the podcast off talking about the idea of “not-yetness”, an idea that I found very interesting. She talks about how its ok to not know all the answers, and how we should embrace not-knowing and not let it stop us from moving forward. She also talks about how “not-yetness” allows for a space of emergence to be created; where there is understanding and new ideas. Chris and Amy then discuss critical pedagogy and the importance of asking questions, which is the stage that I think I am currently in. In these first few weeks of class we have had a plethora of knowledge thrown at us. This surplus of knowledge has led me to asking a lot of questions on what is important, and what will help me develop my teaching philosophy.

Amy then talks about the idea of learnification, and how technology has really propelled it. I found it interesting that when there is too much learnification, there is actually less learning. Amy gave the example of online classrooms that focus too much on the content and completely forget about the teacher-student relationship. This is an issue that I have had with many online courses throughout my undergrad. There was such a large disconnect between the students and professor, that it took value away from the course. Along with learnification, Chris and Amy discuss the importance of embracing risk and uncertainty. They talk about how learning outcomes can be too restrictive and not allow for enough flexibility; without this flexibility, there is no room for risk and uncertainty. I think risk allows for change, so having that risk and uncertainty is very important for learning to adapt and improve.

Finally, Amy talks about the rhetoric of opportunity, an idea from Mike Caulfield. She mentions how Mike believes that the rhetoric of opportunity is better than the rhetoric of crisis, and how a rhetoric of opportunity allows improvements to move forward and keeps dis-improvements behind. I found this idea interesting, and especially liked Chris’ points about viewing students as people with potential instead of waiting for a student to misbehave. I think that this idea is a really important one, and that the rhetoric of opportunity is an incredibly valuable viewpoint for educators.

[This paragraph has been added after having someone asked me to further explain my design, I also posted this response in one of the comments below:

Finally to talk more about my design, I thought it would be fun to draw out a literal road to critical pedagogy that addressed the key points of the podcast. I started with that first square of not-yetness and the rocks that led to the lake of emergence. I wanted to show how not-yetness created the room for the emergence of new ideas and knowledge. The asking questions square is fairly self-explanatory, but I thought I would draw Amy asking some critical questions). I thought it would be fun to show embracing risk and uncertainty with Amy and Chris literally hugging the risk and uncertain-tree. Along with that, having those risk leafs fall and showing Mr. Learning-Outcome with his leaf-blower blowing away the risk. I used that image to show how rigid learning outcomes remove risk, and are not necessarily good. I drew the diverging path of learnification, to illustrate how in same cases technology can lead to negative learnification, steering us off of the path of critical pedagogy. Finally I ended with the square of the rhetoric of opportunity, with the Improvements Turtle, flying to the “finish line” and the Dis-improvement Rabbit, far behind. I wanted to show how in the road of critical pedagogy the rhetoric of opportunity allows the improvements to surpass the dis-improvements. I put the rainbow at the end, because the end of a rainbow is somewhat mythical, and I think that is the same for the road of critical pedagogy. I don’t think there is a concrete end to the road of critical pedagogy, we can always improve and grow, so the road keeps going. ]
References:

Questioning Learning

Not-yetness

Image Sources:

http://worldartsme.com/images/rainbow-outline-free-clipart-1.jpg

https://img.clipartxtras.com/1825f6b2f97475593f9ffd302d68fca1_lake-clipart-black-and-white-clipartxtras-lake-clipart-black-and-white_1024-768.jpeg

https://st3.depositphotos.com/11514374/18632/v/1600/depositphotos_186329928-stock-illustration-cartoon-of-businesswoman-or-woman.jpg

https://previews.123rf.com/images/alexeyzet/alexeyzet1701/alexeyzet170100007/70672983-lieu-de-bande-dessin%C3%A9e-avec-gar%C3%A7on-et-une-fille-a-touch%C3%A9-l-arbre-sur-le-fond-blanc.jpg

https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/funny-cartoon-man-leaf-blower-illustration-68308205.jpg

https://img01.thedrum.com/s3fspublic/drum_kb_article/158038/main_images/TortoiseAndHare_0.jpg

 

Tagged

Guh Guh Guh Guh GHOOOOOST!

Visual Explanation:

The picture attached is a fun way to explain the article “Digital Ghosts in the Modern Classroom” by Ashley Hinck. The illustration starts with a fun ghost busters logo and the first orange arrow (MAIN ISSUE) guides you to Hinck’s central issue about how students are accustom to the simplicity of digital media that allows students to use templates and themes that typically has few errors. This has led students to rely on these platforms, so when they use programs that require coding and the programming presents errors and challenges, the students feel like failures.

The second arrow (EFFECTS) shows how the students get frustrated (as illustrated by the student’s red face). The pictures show bugs and errors presented to the students, and then the student feeling fed-up .

The last arrow (BANISHING THE GHOSTS) is how Hinick suggests we combat these issues. Hinck suggests that we must change the student’s mindsets and approach their failures as challenges and turn them into successes once they have overcome these challenges. This is illustrated by an arm coming out of the graveyard and coming back to life (which is creepy… but represents the student coming back to life, so they are no longer a digital ghost).

Reflection:

I have used many different template websites like Weebly, Wix, Canva… and I have experienced the ease of using these templates to make a visually appealing digital assignment. If I were to create a website or design by myself, I know I would be frustrated and feel like a failure because every time something did not work look beautiful immediately or something did not work I would get frustrated. Knowing this is the way I am as a learner, I will approach digital media for my students as Hinck suggests. I will not take away these sites that allow us to create using templates and themes, but rather help my students to look beyond these platforms and let them experiment without fear of failure to try out different digital platforms. This will increase their comfort, and help them realize that when there are challenges and errors, it does not mean that they have failed.

Enjoy!

Caroline Voyer

 

Hinck’s Article:

Digital Ghosts in the Modern Classroom

Keep Calm and Question On

I chose to respond to the HybridPod Podcast with Chris Friend and Amy Collier using a sketchnote. Prior to this assignment, the extent of my art career was doodling cartoons in the margins of my class notes, which seems to have come in handy for this assignment. I decided to experiment with a sketchnote for this reflection because it is out of my comfort zone, and I wanted to embrace the discomfort of risk-taking, as discussed in the podcast! I had a ton of fun making it, and although the flow is lacking a bit I hope you can follow my thoughts.

Multimedia Reflection #1 (for a closer look)

The main take away from the podcast is the importance of critical pedagogy and questioning the latest and greatest teaching methods. I particularly appreciated the discussion of “canned” courses and how we can break through these with critical pedagogy and integrating technology in the classroom. I think Amy’s focus on embracing the discomfort of not knowing is so important, and teaches students that mistakes are allowed, and often lead to the best learning opportunities.

As a logical thinker who often places too much importance on the “right” answer, I think this podcast was a great introduction to this course for me. In my future classroom I want to emphasize the importance of giving your best effort and questioning the new things that students are learning. With my teachable in math, I think far too many teachers are “my way or the highway” thinkers. As an educator, my goal is to question my pedagogy while encouraging my students to question other ways to find the answers they are looking for. This collaborative environment will allow everyone present to embrace the discomfort of not knowing.

Kate Hatfield

Tagged , ,

Did somebody say ghosts?!?!

I decided to read the Hybrid pedagogy article, “Digital Ghosts in the Modern Classroom” by Ashley Hinck. The article summarizes how most programs we use have a template where we are accustomed and “trained” in a sense, to drag and drop files and follow a guideline of linear steps. The steps will usually lead to a single correct answer. These programs do not enhance student’s ability to think but instead to follow and become ghosts. Students become like an assembly line. They are all working like assembly workers to get a million different copies of the same exact product. This leads to a lack of creativity that many students face. We become like robots, where we are programmed to know a certain level of ideas but cannot work beyond our capacities, due to the template programs that surround us. We forget how to use our most powerful tool in the body, the brain. Hinck suggests that we should move on to more open-ended platforms that give students the freedom to make their own choices and just use their creativity to think outside of the box. However, this leads to a lot of frustration in students as trial and error may seem like they have failed. We need to teach students that failure is normal, and it takes time. There is more than 1 right answer and we need to learn how to troubleshoot when we run into a problem and not just give up. These platforms give students the freedom to become the creators and makers they were meant to be.

I decided to use a sketchnote for this reflection as I was able to think about how I wanted to display my ideas. Starting off with a blank sheet of paper, I was able to go through a few rough drafts and brainstorm the final picture in my head. This platform gave me the freedom to change things up and choose my own fonts, colours, pictures that certain programs may not allow you to do. Being able to choose what platform I wanted was great as it helps reinforce the fact that students do not all have to choose the same platform to display their ideas.

I love the idea of bringing sketchnotes into a classroom. There is no template or guideline that is necessary to follow. Every students work will be different from one another. I know for myself, starting off with nothing was a bit scary. There was no guideline to fall back onto, or that “I think I am doing this right?” mindset. It took some time to start, but once I started the process of making it was enjoyable. It would be a great thing for teachers to use, to see the creativity that each student has, whereas for the students, it will help them think outside of the box. It isn’t like a typical science or math lesson, where they all have to have the same correct answer. They can all come up with different things and will get the same marks as long as the criteria has been met.

Tagged

Are All Students Ghosts? Read to Find Out!

Upon reading the article, Digital Ghosts in the Modern Classroom, by Ashley Hinck, a few concepts jumped out at me. So I decided to create a Sketchnote to show these topics. This Sketchnote began with the idea that students are losing creativity by wanting these templates and step by step technology methods, where they are not any different from others. I also included that I am a part of this group because I tend to enjoy having clear instructions, and this assignment was definitely outside of my comfort zone. However, as much as I am a part of this majority and am outside of my comfort zone, it is important to realize that some of my students may feel outside of their comfort zones in my subject areas. This is why I also included the need to try and encourage more creativity and diversity in our students because no matter what course you teach, there will always be students outside of their comfort zone. However, if we create a strong environment where this creativity is encouraged, students may feel that they are allowed to experiment and try new things, and may even learn that they have a new skill or passion through it. By doing this, there will probably also be a decline in these digital ghosts and an incline in creators and differences. I also believe that it will help create a more positive learning experience for all students involved.

I also really enjoyed building this Sketchnote, despite it being outside of my comfort zone for an assignment. It is also a user friendly source because you are creating it yourself. However, I did find it was difficult to show the meaningful connections to teaching through this source, and would potentially try a different source for future discussion posts.

Tagged

To Risk or Not to Risk: Which is Better When It Comes to Teaching?

This blog post is a response to the interview conducted by Chris Friend with Amy Collier regarding critical digital pedagogy and the concept of not yet-ness. My thoughts and the key points presented in the podcast are briefly summarized in my sketchnote. I choose to do a sketchnote for this post partially because of the structure of the interview. In the interview, the concept of not yet-ness is the main focus. Not yet-ness is simply a term used to describe the feeling of trying something new but not really getting what is going on. In a pedagogical sense, it can refer to teachers trying new and riskier teaching methods without fully getting or understanding the end result. Throughout the interview, Amy contrasts this teaching method with the traditional pedagogy, which can be described as learnification. Learnification refers to the transition from teaching to learning at higher education. It also places an emphasis on individualized learning. Therefore, my sketchnote highlights the defining features of each pedagogical method as two paths that new teachers can travel down. I want to present a contrast in my multimedia reflection as described in the podcast.

The key difference between learnification and not yet-ness is presence of risk. The traditional and commonly used method “de-risk” the situation as Amy describes it. Students are assessed similarly and learning outcomes are formulaic. Teachers can efficiently assess the students and the risk of things going wrong is much lower because all the variables are removed. In a sense, having something stable and unchanging is very appealing in consideration of one’s career. From my perspective, I do believe that the concept of learnification is faulty. However, I do not believe that all the connotations attached to it are bad. For example, formulaic assessments may not totally be a bad thing. At higher education, when class sizes become too large, it becomes incredibly inefficient to consider and satisfy the needs of individual students. I believe that teachers and professors do consider this when formulating their learning outcomes and designing their lesson plans. However, this does not mean that teachers cannot engage in risk-taking from time to time (from what I learned in Pedagogy of the Arts course, risk-taking is the best form of learning). I believe that good teachers do take risks at times, to design lesson plans and learning outcomes that excite the student and themselves as a result of students’ work. I strongly agree with Amy that teachers should drive curiosity and improve the educational experience of students. With not yet-ness, teachers have a lot of room to grow and reflect through mistakes and uncertainties (self-reflection is incredibly important for effective teaching as highlighted in Philosophy course). If I must summarize my point of view, I will say that different situation calls for different needs. Good teachers will know how to differentiate between the two and take the correct path when needed to improve learning for students.

The other reason I choose to do a sketchnote is because I want to try out a new form of “note-taking”. Throughout my academic career, I have taken many notes but doing a sketchnote makes me realize that adding a visual element can really make my notes and points appealing to readers (including myself). With sketchnote, I learn how to effectively summarize the key ideas and points and demonstrate the link between various aspects of the presentation. I notice that I retain the information much easier than with a text-only note. With the increasing demand that teachers be more digitally literate, I believe that this multimedia reflection gives me a great opportunity to try out a different form of response and develop my skills in this area. I hope to improve myself in sketchnoting and in other platforms that I may use in the future.

Edit: Added link to interview

Edit 2: From all the wonderful comments below, I just want to say that sketchnote is definitely a consideration for me when it comes to teaching. I am not sure how it will work yet, but I guess this reinforces the point that Amy Collier makes when it comes to critical pedagogy, that new teachers take risks and try something new. In a sense, that sensation can be described as not yet-ness.

Digital Critical Pedagogy – The world’s changing! Time we change to!

During my time reading and listening to Hybridod Episode 10, featuring Amy Collier as the guest speaker, it was time that we would dive into the importance of critical pedagogy and a new theory known as ‘not-yetness’, a theory that is around the basis of feeling good about not knowing something. We go on our adventure together of understanding what it means to be uncertain and relating it to the technology we use in today’s society. I have an outline attached to the podcast information and my personal beliefs to Amy Collier’s discussion.   I will give a brief overview on how our journey will go. Get ready……… however you wish. Whether you would like to read it aloud to yourself, have some read I to you, or clicking the link to the actual podcast with the script attached is up to you. As Amy has told us and what you will discover yourself, life is not a simple A to B straight line. We all have different ways to reach a goal and have our own obstacles in our way before we can reach that path. We will discuss the importance of critical thinking and connecting it to technology and use education models to support our theory. Just to give you a snap shot of how sometimes questions that seem very straight forward, never are that easy. Enjoy this little presentation and remember “The world’s changing! Time we change to!” (Anyone get that reference? Sorry killed the mood.)

HybridPod, Ep. 10 — Questioning Learning

Script

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gi9yWH0xszyNppPs5-YjW6x1EpgDPxsA789_MDQwGOM/pub

Presentation

What education means today!

Tagged

Templates are Destroying Creativity

I am responding to the Hybrid pedagogy article; Digital ghosts in the modern classroom by Ashley Hinck. This article describes the tendency of students to use online templates for assignments and even for social media. She describes the templates as limiting, a drag and drop platform leaving no room for creativeness and invention. These templates are easier to use but students do not learn anything from them. The author challenges her students to use different platforms that allow for them to invent their own theme as well as look at different social media sites with a critical eye. Wonder why they limit words, why the profile picture is in that location and how they incorporate task bars in their websites. This will give the students a better understanding of the technological age in which they live. I found this article to be surprisingly interesting. After the author made these points I was able to see that students fall back on these templates out of comfort level, because the work is already done for them and because they are afraid to step outside of the box. A template simply gives them someone’s ideas so that they don’t have to use their brain to solve a problem. These students see a problem and run away instead of confronting it. Ashley mentions that they are afraid of trial and error they feel as though the answer should just be right there in front of them. This is a very narrow mindset that is often enforced on students; that there is only one right answer and it is the end of the world to get the wrong one. I have outlined many of the problems with templates and solutions that the author has suggested integrated with my own ideas as well as why I believe the students choose to use templates in a mind map below: hope you enjoy!

click link to for better view —> Templates are destroying creativity

Teachers & Technology – Friends or Foes?

My colleagues and I are very fortunate to be the first generation that had technology integrated into our classroom. However, there is a time and place for everything. Online courses have not been around for too long, and we can see that they are not as productive as we would hope for. However online courses might be able to become friendlier. On the podcast, they discussed several alternatives to engage students more in an online setting.

The Piktochart itself was so simple to make. I can see myself using this in my professional career in both math and physics. The first use that comes to mind is online posters for the students to look at before the subject is taught. For example, for Classical Mechanics (a chapter in Physics that studies motion), perhaps have animations of cars driving faster than other cars, or different weights falling. I could also incorporate some text in the form of bullet points, next to the images to stimulate their thinking. It would be great for my students to look at for 5 minutes the night before the lesson. Just to give them some basic ideas on what we’ll be talking about. I strongly recommend to all of my colleagues to try this application because it is super user-friendly. Just make sure to use Google Chrome since Internet Explorer is not compatible with the website.

One does not simply understand not-yetness

After listening to the podcast Questioning Learning from Hybrid Pedagogy, so many answers to questions about education throughout my life started to pop into my head, it was an epidemic of epiphanies.  Before I share some of those questions, and some answers to them, let me first tell you about this podcast that cleared up the kerfuffles in my mind.  For starters, the woman of the hour, Amy Collier, was interviewed by Chris Friend about many exciting and interesting topics including learnification, “not-yetness”, learning outcomes and many more crucial topics about our education system.  Amy started to talk about what learning outcomes are in the education system today compared to what she thought they can evolve into.  Outcomes nowadays try to measure our “understanding” of academics by making us spew our memorized knowledge about something onto a piece of paper, then getting judged on how much “stuff” we regurgitate.  If the tone isn’t clear enough, I’m not a huge fan of this type of learning outcome.  However, Amy talked about a new way to think about understanding and learning outcomes by asking questions like ” What would cause me to be amazed at what my students can do?”  This is where outcomes can become more inspirational and creative.

 

Going back to my own education, I have suffered too long under boring and monotonous teachers that don’t challenge the students understanding.  Where the class structure is always the same – lecture, homework, lecture homework.  In my own experience, this destroys the ability to create an innovative classroom environment where students ask the questions  “why does that happen?” and “Is there another way?”  I know many others have been through the same gauntlet and I hope that one day, me and other educators, can change how students are taught.

 

When trying to come up with a visual to portray my thoughts, I had some serious issues.  I didn’t know how to use any artsy program online and there was no way I was going to draw, at least something remotely recognizable.  That’s when I came across a huge box full of stickers, markers, paper, and any other type of scrap booking essential in my house that I had no idea I owned (thanks to my wife).  Thus, started my adventure through arts and crafts heaven.  Et Voila! Perfection!

Tagged