Category Archives: 322monday20

Warning: This post is a little Sketchy…

I decided to take a step back from technology for this artifact and focus on something I would enjoy creating which is a piece of art. I choose to create a Sketchnote (hence the title) so I could represent the key points through drawings and doodles. I thoroughly enjoyed this, although sketches are usually quick and I choose to create my artifact using watercolour and pens, which was very tedious to get to the level of satisfactory, I wanted. I also chose this medium because it didn’t require my to stare at a screen for countless hours, which I found is all that we have been doing throughout our University career. Using this style of artifact gave me full control of the creativity and design of my outcome, down to the texture of the paper, and the colour of the people’s clothing. (I choose to give all characters orange shirts as orange represents enthusiasm, creativity, determination, encouragement, and stimulation.) A small detail like this can have a larger affect on the viewer if they understand the significance, and I believe these characteristics are all important aspects a learner should have/do.

Some downsides to this medium is that I was working with ink, something that cannot be easily undone or erased if a mistake if made (unlike when creating things using technology.) This came into effect when I realized I made the main focus on Digital Literacies and not Technologist Module. I needed to then create someway to shift the focus from one heading to another which I did with arrows and brighter colours. Another downside is that with technology you can usually edit and rearrange as you go, with drawing I had to create 4 rough copies, before I was satisfied enough to begin a good copy (and still made mistakes along the way.)

 

Now let’s dive into the article content!

The technologist module Design Thinking Process is intended to spark new ideas, and use feedback to improve said ideas. This specific module follows the course of empathize, define, ideate, prototype and connect.

Before designing anything, we must understand what the users need, and not cloud this with what we want. During my practicum, there were many activities or games that I WANTED to do, however, with tests and projects due, I knew the students needed more time to prepare. Putting student’s needs should always come before anyone’s “wants”. The article suggests creating empathy maps to understand what the users think, feel, do, say and hear, and their difficulties understanding course material. I think understanding our students and knowing how they view things or feel about certain material is crucial in the early lesson planning stages, as well as this design-thinking module, especially if there is a student who is sensitive to a specific topic or is easily triggered during specific tasks. This feedback will help in the next step of the module, which is to define their challenge.

Defining their challenges will help create a focal point in which we can use to build our solution. I have depicted various “good learner challenges” described in the article on my sketch note such as “provides focus and FRAMES the challenge”. Get it…. It’s in a picture frame….. ANYWAYS, in a classroom I’ve found that if I can pinpoint exactly where my student is struggling, say a certain step in a math problem always tricks them, then I can easily make a plan to help them. If I don’t understand what or where the challenge is, it is going to take longer to help them out. It’s easier to fix one step rather than starting all over from the beginning.

Once you have taken steps to understand your learner, and identified their challenge (whether it be a mental block or physical block) it’s time to form an idea. Generating mind maps, or using similar tools will help outline all ideas and tools that may benefit your learner. It will take time to sift through the tools and see which offer supports or features that will directly help a learners needs. I find this brainstorming step is usually the one that is most tedious, and stressful, however once I get my thoughts organized in a brainstorm, or mind map, things usually start flowing smoother.

 

 

Now that you have selected a technology, you may begin creating your tool or prototype. You must design a desired outcome, share ideas with others and consider their feedback. Using their opinions alter your design so that it will best suit your learner. I always found this process helpful in my own creative projects such as a piece of art. Often I would need another set of eyes to point out something I was blind too and work through it before I could really be satisfied with it. Even when it came to my practicum, I thought I would have an amazing idea for a lesson plan and would pitch it to my AT, they would give me truthful feedback such as “maybe try this aswell” or “ instead of this… try this”. It helps getting an experienced opinion on things we are unfamiliar, or unsatisfied with.

 

Connecting to the curriculum in our field is really the end goal (if we aren’t counting raising children to be wonderful humans). We are required to teach specific components, but have the freedom to put our own spin on them. So at the end of our planning stage or the lesson or design we have to ask ourselves, how does this fit into the curriculum, and what will the students take away from this? Are there clear learning goals they can follow, and steps to succeed?

 

 

 

-Paige Godin

Always Integrate Technology, Right? At Least Try This First

After working through eCampus Ontario’s Technologist Module in class and further on my own time, I choose to visually represent my ideas in the form of an Infographic. I consider myself to be more creative rather than artistic so I enjoy using the templates provided by Canva. These templates allow me just enough artistic freedom to make my own unique artifact but not enough that I am liable to screw anything up. I liked the idea of posing a question to readers when they look at my Infographic and then going on to explain the possible answers to that question while still allowing the readers to formulate their own opinions. As educators many of us may have different comfort levels and attitudes when it comes to technology integration versus traditional tried and practiced teacher centered strategies. I, however, am very open to the integration of technology in the classroom and think I framed my Infographic in a way that got that message across.

The Technologist Module did an excellent job of outlining steps to use when contemplating technology integration into the classroom. The creators of the module essentially asked, “Are you stuck between deciding if using innovative technology or evidence based is best?” then went on to provide a process for determining if technology integration is the best option for you. The creators of this module suggested using Design Thinking, which is a solution based approach to solving small problems on route to solving the much bigger more complex problems. The five steps to Design Thinking are empathize, define, ideate, prototype and connect. During the first step teachers need to take the time to learn from their students to determine what is truly needed. Learning about what excites students, what they love to do and what they’re afraid of will help determine what the problem really is and is the first step to the solution. During the define stage teachers need to use their intuition to make sense of the information they’ve learned through conversations with their students. In the next stage it’s important to start building and forming ideas of what the ideal features and characteristics of how technology integration may solve your problem. This is also the stage where you may determine that technology integration isn’t the answer or that you may need to dig deeper into framing the problem. In the prototype stage asking “how might we?” questions will help to bridge the gap between design principles and specific ideas, using play and experimentation while designing, sharing and refining prototypes will help with this process. The final stage of Design Thinking is to connect.  This is the time to connect to the curriculum, speak to teachers and students and remember to never stop trying to improve when it comes to integrating technology into your classroom.

During each of my practicum placements I’ve struggled with making the choice between whether it was appropriate to integrate technology into my lessons or if another approach would be best suited for those particular situations. Knowing about Design Thinking and the process proposed by the Technologist Module would have helped to make those decisions and not leave me second guessing myself. As a new teacher who is relatively new to bringing technology in the classroom often times my technology integration was doing nothing to elevate my lessons, instead I was simply using technology as a tool substitution but not making any functional changes to the lesson. As someone who is going to be a physical education teacher I am always trying to think of ways to reach learners of all styles in the gym which at times can be even more difficult when in the classroom. When asked to complete a task such as hitting a baseball some students may need a different type of instruction to succeed than the conventional methods. Using Design Thinking I would have a conversation with my students and learn that they really enjoy watching video of professional athletes and that just being told how to do something isn’t the way they learn best. I would then come to the conclusion that my problem to solve may be how do I incorporate technology into my class to teach my students how to hit a baseball. Working through the next phases of the decision making process I would come to the conclusion that redefining my lesson using technology integration would help my students immensely. I could have my students watch video examples, practice the technique and then video tape the students hitting balls which would allow me to give feedback about their technique.

Hope you enjoy my Infographic!  If the thumbnail below is too hard to read here’s a link to the PDF file. Multimedia Artifact (PDF)

Christine

Get with the times – Technologist

I used the medium of Canva to represent the ideas from the module of Technologist. In the form of a infographic, I looked at aspects of how to implement technology into the classroom.  I am comfortable with using Canva and enjoy the use of templates to help me through the process. Canva has many different options and is easy to use. The way the classroom is going, being technological savvy and knowing how to implement technology into the classroom in a successful manner should be a priority to educators in my opinion.

This module did a great job of walking through the five steps of digital-thinking including empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and connect. Empathize refers that the redesign of thinking starts with empathy. The Define step is about narrowing in and identifying a problem based on what you know and have discovered about your learner. In this stage educators need to define the learner’s challenge. According to the module, a good learner challenge is one that: provides focus and frames the challenge, inspires you and others around you, informs how you will evaluate subsequent ideas, captures the hearts and minds of your users, helps you focus on developing concepts and plans that meet the needs for most of the people that matter. The ideate stage looks at building ideate features and characteristics of how technology could address your learner challenge. The module says that the best way to approach this is to build a list of possibilities by asking yourself: “how might I?”. The next stage of prototype involves putting a small tangible creation in front of your users instead of talking about abstract ideas. The steps of prototype include design, share and refine. Finally connect to the curriculum and crafting an implementation plan as to how students will progress through your technological creation as an activity.

Each module did a good job at explaining what each of the five steps were and an activity to help understand how to implement each step into the class. Throughout my practicum experience I have had to use technology in many different scenarios, teaching lessons, assessment opportunities, lesson planning etc., and digital skills and technology were needed. Specifically, in a math lesson in data management,  I taught using the smart board  as a the main lesson. Students had to come to the smart board and move their person under whatever sport they liked the most. In this case, the students were familiar with the smart board and comfortable with using it. When I first planned on using this lesson I was not familiar with the smart board and had to test out the lesson prior so I knew how to use it. In order for students to use the technology and get the full understand of the class or activity, educators need to understand how to use it so it is clear to the students. Growing up where the push of technology just started, I did not learn the use of technology so this module would be helpful for me to utilize technology within the classroom in the world today.

 

Ashley Pastorius

“Don’t Rock the Boat” – A Rant on China’s Social Credit System

My video is discussing the Matthew Carney article titled “Leave No Dark Corner”. The article discusses the upcoming implementation of a digital “social credit” system in the People’s Republic of China, and the potential impact on the average Chinese citizenry. Two perspectives are actively discussed. “Dandan” is a working professional, who is content with the system, and benefits from having a high “social credit” score, which leads to benefits like better loan rates, or not needing a deposit on a car rental. On the other hand, Liu Hu is an investigative journalist who has a low “social credit” score, and is negatively impacted by being blocked from social media, or being unable to obtain plane or high speed rail tickets to travel to different cities. The system takes information from CCTV cameras, and interactions on social media, as well as a myriad of other data inputs to provide a real-time “social credit” score. Say, you buy too much alcohol in one shopping trip, and your real-time “social credit” score may decrease. On top of personal impact, citizens may also be positively or negatively impacted based on who they interact with, or what their friends or family might say. Due to the seriousness of the topic, I decided to make a video rant, as I feel that my thoughts and feelings on this issue may be limited if I try to depict it with some abstract visual medium.

 

Reflection

The ideas of social credit is a concerning one, as it adds a new layer of control onto a person’s life. It formalizes the social controls into something with legal consequences. It creates a tiered system where those with unpopular views may be further isolated by society, and likely be put into a bubble that will only be formalized even further. Social media has already created bubbles and confirmation bias, but this system would add to an already polarized society. Plus, with more totalitarian governments, they can use this system to further suppress dissent.

Privacy Concerns regarding ClassDogo

My reflection is going to focus on the article “Privacy Concerns for Class Dogo and Other Tracking Apps for School Children” by Natasha Singer which can be found here:

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/17/technology/privacy-concerns-for-classdojo-and-other-tracking-apps-for-schoolchildren.html?emc=edit_tnt_20141117&nlid&_r=0

The twitter essay that I did speaks on the main points of the article and looks at both the pros and cons of using an app such as ClassDogo in your classroom for tracking your students’ behaviour and using it as a tool for classroom management, which can be found here:

The first time I saw this type of behaviour modification strategy being used was while I was doing a three week placement in Nuneaton, England where students were given points based on specific expectations like attendance, submission of assignments on time, GPA, etc and every week a student was named “student of the year” based on whoever had the highest point that week. From the outcomes and student behaviour, it came across as a positive strategy to me because this caused students to be driven and motivated to be the student of the week. Attendance especially was very good in that school and not a lot of students missed many classes. The reason there was no issue with this strategy was that the points tracking was done on paper and was kept in the classroom and was only accessible to the students and the teacher, so there was no issue of data tracking and being available to the open world. After reading this text, and seeing how useful this type of behaviour strategy can be, I prefer doing this type of class tracking non-digitally so that it completely avoids the issue of privacy concerns and data tracking, though I understand it  is a lot more work for teachers to keep track of all their students manually, and not as easy for parents to have access to their child progress.

In conclusion, according to Singer’s article, parents are greatly divided on their views regarding use of apps like ClassDogo for tracking their child’s behaviour and progress. While some parents love the idea because its an easier and constant report on their child’s progress in school, other parents disapprove as they feel this can bring forth labels on their children and could lead to unforeseeable consequences. As I am not very tech savvy, or digitally aware as much as I should be, it was after reading this article I realized the seriousness of how usage of these apps have furthermore consequences such as data tracking that can be used for other purposes by a third party.

Facebook’s going down, I’m yelling timber!

Matt Rosoff’s article examines the decline in the number of users the social media outlet has experienced due to recent sandals. While Facebook has been experiencing a decline, it still manages to have 2.23 billion monthly users. Facebook owns many other social media platforms such as WhatsApp, Instagram and Messenger which has helped them overcome their recent struggles as seen in Apple’s rankings of most popular free applications. Over the recent

year, Instagram has become a platform that has generated a high income. Instagram has grown 204%  year over year due to the number of advertisements which can be seen while using the application. Sponsored advertisements may have to be incorporated into WhatsApp and Messenger as another source of income in order to help save Facebook.

Looking more in depth at the recent Pew survey which included over 3,400 U.S. Facebook users, it concluded that millennials are either deleting the app, taking a break from it or many are simply adjusting their privacy settings. Facebook users are choosing to adjust their privacy settings due to the recent Cambridge Analytica event which breached users’ personal information. Moreover, Facebook is seeing a decline in users as Russian operatives also used Facebook to spread false news to influence the 2016 presidential elections.

Although there is a continued growth of Facebook users overseas, Facebook is seeing a major stall in North American users which included myself not so long ago. Before I engaged with the text, the Cambridge Analytica and the presidential scandal were not among my reasonings to delete Facebook, but I did find myself among Image may contain: one or more people and stripesone of the 42% users who needed to take a break. Every so often I choose to delete social media apps from my phone such as Facebook, Instagram or Snapchat which allows me to disconnect and just be present. After reading Rosoff’s article, I may reconsider removing myself from social media more often.  I deleted my Facebook account for over a year but I chose to reactivate my account for a few reasons. Facebook is a great application that allows me to keep in contact with previous teammates, family members and friends living all over the world. Not having a Facebook account often left me on the outside of the team’s Facebook page and multiple group projects as Messenger was the preferred means of communication. I now use the app mainly to keep up with my mom’s blog of her new puppy because I do not have the liberty of watching her grow back home in Montreal. Facebook privacy may have its downfalls, but it allows me to post albums and adjust the privacy settings so only I can see them. I enjoy this Image result for icloud storage messagefeature because iCloud doesn’t have the capacity to hold all of my pictures and I’m too cheap to pay for extra storage in all honesty. The text forced me to be more critical and think about what I am posting on social media because I now know that my photos aren’t only seen by me and that others may have access to them as well. Overall, I still enjoy using Facebook and being able to interact with friends and family through one simple click or like and I will think twice about posting something on Facebook in the future.

For the purpose of this assignment, I chose to create a mind map to summarize Rossoff’s article. I used Canva this time around which is similar to Piktochart which I used for the first multimedia artifact. I found Canva to be more user friendly and easier to navigate. I had access to a mouse and a large computer screen which I believed lessened my frustrations. Having the mouse allowed me to center objects somewhat better than Piktochart which relieved some of my OCD for small details as such. Overall, it was a much more positive experience creating this mind map.

Click to view my mind map! 

Data-Driven Explained Through Data Presented Education STARRING: Mindomo

For this post I decided to showcase mindomo to present the information of Data-Driven Education by Khurram Virani. The reason I chose to present through Mindomo is because it is a program supported for mindmapping by both the Public AND the Catholic Board here in Windsor (you can trust me, I did the training!). Thus I thought it would be fun to showcase something teachers can use with their students no matter where their placements will be.

The program is fairly intuitive allowing for keyboard shortcuts to add new content bubbles as well as on screen buttons. It also allows for the direct linking of media from youtube or google image search, making customization easy. The app even has an iPad version :O!

The only problem I have with mindomo is that it can be a bit jarring for students who are used to working with mindmaps in the round, as mindomo works in either a linear or tiered model. Linear having farther removed ideas being farther from the center in a line (as shown on the mindmap created below), and tiered making it look something like a tournament bracket rather than an actual mindmap.

You can click here to see the full range of ideas discussed in the video but I believe the biggest take away from this video is that education does not take enough risks. It likes to stay within tried and true methods (much like this blogpost) rather than reaching out and risking failure. I would argue that just as last weeks blog post encouraged students not to fear failure we should also be teaching our teachers the same thing, as failure is how we adapt and innovate. If education fails to do this I fear it will always be just a few steps behind of where the world is today, let alone where it is headed tomorrow.

What ideas/beliefs make you react the way you do

These ideas come from the philosophy that failure is a learning opportunity, not necessarily just a result. It is the way we as humans learn what doesn’t work and, in doing so, continue striving for a better answer.

What were your ideas before

My ideas before related to data driven education were skeptical at first. I had seen many times algorithms fail and send me ads for things I did not care about. Relating it to education, I worried it would be much the same, striking many false positives and derailing a students education with misrepresented ques.

What pieces of new information did you find?

What I found was it is less about collecting all the data available, but selecting which data points are important for education. This would be like if the ad search looked at my open shopping carts on websites for information on what to advertise rather than the one off conversation I had with a friend.  What also resonated with me was the ideas that schools still cannot properly teach their students for the world ahead, let alone what is coming, due to the need to test and retest and confirm before they are willing to push any boundaries.

2020 is the new 1984

In reading “No Dark Corner” by Matthew Carney it is hard to not recall the famous novel by George Orwell.

The article explores the rewards based system that China is planning for 2020. It will score individuals based on prior achievement and future choices. There is a pilot project already in place which uses 200 million CCTV cameras to live update citizen’s scores. High achieving individuals receive VIP status at airports and hotels and no down payments on things like car rentals or homes. It is hard to argue that this doesn’t sound appealing. Who wouldn’t want to be rewarded for good behaviour? If you always pay your bills on time and are a model citizen why shouldn’t you receive some perks here and there? Everyone loves a gold star.

However, there is the other side of the coin. Low performing individuals are penalized to the degree of being cast out of their own society. They become unable to purchase travel tickets, or acquire certain jobs. There is a Chinese journalist who has become housebound and fears for the future security of his family. His freedom of speech has been removed and his social media censored. The thought alone of this is terrifying to me, however it is in fact a dystopian future that many people are living.

The idea of this is so jarring to me because I am fortunate to live in a country where I have freedom of speech and am able to make as many (reasonable) life mistakes as I choose without facing severe repercussions.

When I think of this notion of reward and retract in terms of education, I see some scary parallels. I understand that China’s demerit system is the extreme, but rewards based systems have existed in education for years. When these types of reinforcements are used in the classroom we are telling students that their worth is based off of a quantifiable number. Some of this parallel can be observed in Natasha Singer’s “Privacy Concerns for Class Dojo and Other Tracking Apps for Schoolchildren”.

In reflecting on both articles, I know that I believe that classroom management and creating rules and consequences for students is imperative. I also firmly believe in teaching them transferrable life skills and that teaching those skills are arguably more important than curriculum. However, I don’t believe in tracking behaviour and rewarding certain students while routinely punishing others. I also firmly disagree with the awful component of publicly tracking them. This method simply tells students that we value them solely off of their behaviour and not based on what they have to contribute to the learning environment.

In my classrooms I have tried to the best of my ability to make it part of my practice to welcome all facets of students, positive and negative. I think when we give ourselves a way to keep tabs on student behaviour it can influence the way we think and feel about them. I aspire to get to the point where I am able to leave most of my preconceived notions and conscious and subconscious biases at the door of my room.

 

For this artifact I chose to complete a Twitter thread because I am more comfortable with writing out my thoughts than representing them visually (although the gif’s do add alot). I tried to post the thread the first time but only the gif’s posted with no written content. PANIC ENSUED. I am not super tech savvy and started to freak. I had lost all of my work with nothing saved. I was restarting at ground zero. I recreated the thread to the best of my memory (the gif’s I had used the first time actually helped me remember my written content – shocking), screen shotted them this time just in case and reposted. Tada, my first successful Twitter thread. I felt complete relief and something akin to pride in my ability to get it to work.

Check out my social media prowess

Still not entirely sure how other people nicely embed photos into their actual posts. I will make that my goal for my next artifact assignment!

To Use, Or Not to Use. That Is The Question.

I read the article Privacy Concerns for ClassDojo and Tracking Apps for Schoolchildren by Natasha Singer. This article is about the use of Behavioural Tracking apps to manage a classroom by Teachers. The article explains some concerns from parent’s perspective and teacher/administrator’s perspective.

There was more brought up in this article beyond the scope of privacy concerns. I think the bigger concerns that were made in the article was more of a reputation or feeling that can be imposed on the student by using a platform like this because it does keep this information in their database. As far as I know, if its anything like KnowledgeHook for set up the system only gets the students name and grade so concerns of privacy, I don’t think that any of the information can really be traced back to that specific student. Now for developing a reputation for the student, I don’t think that the apps will enhance or develop this “Problem Child” type of reputation. Teachers talk and each student has a file that follows them through their school career anyway so the reputation already gets predisposed whether it’s with the use of an app or not. My multimedia piece has included some personal experience but generally speaking, I see it in the classroom where a Grade 8 teacher has talked to me about how they remember when a student was in Grade 1 or 2 and they told me about the horror story even back then. However, just because the reputation is there does not mean we as teachers look at it and turn back to a high school version of ourselves and trust the rumors. It is a teacher’s duty to provide each student with equal opportunity to prove themselves in the classroom. With respect to imposing an emotional strain on students from explicitly having the students remove their own points and then having a negative sound heard by the entire class, there are other ways to address the situation. But again, this happens anyway with or without the use of an app. When a student gets addressed in front of the class because of their conduct a teacher may call them out in a split second reaction/decision or they will pull them aside after the lesson. My personal experience with this when I was in Elementary and Secondary School, the embarrassment to be singled out has actually been a motivator for me to behave the way I should. Maybe it’s not the best motivator but it worked. In conclusion, yes I think we can use these databases in the classroom and there’s not really a lot of harm to be done. It supports punishment and reward based behaviours.

I actually looked into using a tracking app like this for my class last year. I looked into using ClassCraft. I honestly thought it looked like fun and wish I had something like it when I was in school. However, I did not end up engaging with it because it seemed like it was a lot of work on my part and I just wasn’t ready for that while lesson planning. I had never considered the scope of which these apps could really effect a child in the long term. Teachers having potential access to the database following the student through all of elementary and high school. I do hope to use it moving forward but I’m glad I read this article because now I can make a conscious effort to take all the precautions necessary prior to trying to implement it into the classroom.

For this reflection, I downloaded a software called Mindjet MindManager and basically, all it allows you to do is some mind mapping. I found it fairly simple to work with and didn’t take me long to make at all. The hardest part was trying to make sure it looked organized by just rearranging arrows. Overall, I would probably use this again. I would have liked to add a legend but the program does not allow me to so look below for a legend to help guide your viewing experience.

 

Click picture for larger viewing. 

Prior to viewing:

  • Yellow: Basic Description of Class Dojo
  • Purple: Parent’s Perspective
  • Blue: Teacher’s Perspective
  • Orange: My Perspective Weighing out the Pros and Cons (my verdict is YES)
    • Red is YES Path & Green is NO Path
  • Dotted Lines: Display some overlap amongst the different perspectives or ideas.

Tagged

Is this more effective than banning phones in class?

The article that I chose to focus on this week was: Tackling Tech: How some Ontario teachers are attempting to limit students’ cellphone use by Nadine Yousif.

This time around, I decided not to go with a Template or Drag-n-Drop platform and decided to physically draw out my article summary/reflection by hand. I have never made a sketchnote before (and I’m not the greatest artist around), but I found this method to be kind of freeing as I was able to do literally whatever I wanted to do. At the same time, I feel like there were some restrictions, but more-or-less due to my inability to art well.

I have never done a sketchnote before, so now I can say that I have! Image result for smile emoji

Below you will find the sketchnote of my summarization:

   (Forgive my awful drawings! It’s the thought the counts!)

This article discusses the topic of allowing students to have their cellphones with them at their desks, but only with the utilization of the Yondr Case (a case that locks students’ phones away until the teacher unlocks it), or the more lenient, DIY Resistor Case (a similar idea but with Velcro instead of a lock to deter students from opening due to the loud sound).

These cases were created as a sure way to make sure that students would not be distracted by their cellular devices during class. According to the article, there are benefits of using either of that case with claims made from multiple Ontarian teachers who state that they have noticed a difference in the performance of their students. These teachers find that with the removed distraction of smartphones and devices, students seem to be more focused and are getting better scores than they had before.

The article also makes claims that these phone cases are seemingly more effective than having an outright ban of devices in the classroom (a ban that even Ontario Premier Doug Ford has proposed).

 

Personally, I have never heard of these cases before, and I can definitely see and understand how they can work and be of use in the classroom, but I also feel like you shouldn’t rule out technology in the classroom altogether.

I have both witnessed and experienced the distracting nature of cellphones in the classroom; however, I have also both witnessed and experienced the benefits of utilizing them in the classroom as well.

I have been the student in the room that has tried to escape from a boring lecture by scrolling through social media, and I have also been the student that pays extra attention when Kahoot! comes into play, or if we are exploring something digitally as a class that keeps me engaged on the topic at hand.

The same thing goes for the students that I have had the opportunity to teach thus far. I can see when they are disengaging and often times this turns into reaching into their pockets for their devices to stimulate their interests and escape from something they find to be boring. At the same time, these same students absolutely love and completely engage when Quizziz, Kahoot!, Gizmo, or the iPads in general come out.

In regards to these cases, it seems as though with the Yondr case, teachers are essentially locking away students’ phones until the students leave the classrooms. This leaves little to no opportunity to utilize technology in the class altogether.

So, with that being said, if I really had to choose between the two cases, I would definitely go with the more lenient DIY version that is the Resistor Case. Although students are still “locking away their devices”, they are doing so with Velcro. This is supposed to deter them from wanting to open their phones during class (because of the loud sounds the Velcro makes) which is apparently supposed to help teach students self-regulation when using their devices.

Another reason that I like the Velcro option more is that even though students are still putting their phones away, they are not physically locked out of the cases which allows opportunities for students to utilize their cellphones in class when it is appropriate to do so (i.e when the teacher has permitted it in class and a lesson requires its use).

As a teacher and a student, I understand the frustration that technology can have in the classroom, and I can understand why teachers may want to ban it all together; however, at the end of the day, I truly believe that technology can be a powerful tool in the classroom if utilized properly. Honestly, it seems absolutely ludicrous to me that there are conversations of banning cellphones in the classroom. Technology is always advancing and as educators we need to keep up with it and find ways to utilize them in the education of our students. Yes, students may be tempted to stray from their tasks with their devices, but it is a good idea to help them learn how to self-regulate and be responsible with their devices so that they may do great things.

But, that’s just my opinion. I would love to hear yours!