Monthly Archives: October 2018

Is There a Digital Ghost Haunting You?

After reading the article Digital Ghosts in the Modern Classroom by Ashley Hinck, I was given a better understanding of the consequences of constantly using worksheets and pre-made templates in schools for the students’ creativity. Hinck points out that, by using those templates, we are preventing students from being creative and setting them up for what they see as a failure, when they struggle to do something on their own. Especially in a digital sense, when using templates on websites, we are restricting ourselves to a very small number of templates that might not fit what we are trying to express. As I mentioned briefly in the video, I was able to, first hand, experience what Hinck was talking about. I was becoming very frustrated working on this video because it was far from straight forward. I did what I could manage and below you will find that doodle video, made on Animaker. The video summarizes the points I thought were most important from the article, as well as touches on a few of my feelings on the topic, which may resonate with you or you may disagree with! Cheers.

https://youtu.be/r6MIjSSPVCM

My link doesn’t seem to want to cooperate but this Nelly song does, so partly to prove that I wasn’t lacking digital skills and just didn’t know how to do it (and I did trial-and-error several things), partly because throwback Nelly is great, and partly because it was only just a dream that I thought everything would work out smoothly, I decided to leave it here for you guys to enjoy! Just don’t forget to click on the hyperlink above to see my video!

It’s Time to Exercise these Digital Demons

Digital Ghosts in the Modern Classroom – Ashley Hinck

http://hybridpedagogy.org/questioning-learning/

I found the article by Hinck to be extremely relevant and also relatable from a personal standpoint. Digital Technology is a massive part of education now, and will only continue to grow, and teachers are afforded the responsibility to ensure it is used to unlock the students greatest potential, Hinck points out in this article that this is not happening. As far back as I can remember, and as recently as last school year, I have always been quick to resort to pre-made templates and shortcuts when tasked with making a presentation of some sort. It was definitely not as evident then, how much this was killing my own creativity, however this issue was brought to light in this article and forced me to critically think back on how I used digital technology in my own experiences. You can’t “drag-and-drop” your way to success in life, and I believe it’s imperative that students learn to tackle problems with innovation and without a fear of failure. Shortcuts and templates can guarantee results in the end, but what was learned in the process of ‘making’, or was there really any process of making at all? One of the concepts from Hinck’s article that really resonated with me was her connection between playing with LEGO and how we should be inspiring children to think and take on projects and challenges. Hinck states that “building LEGO without directions can invite openness, creativity, and agency,” and I believe these qualities are lacking in today’s digital pedagogies. I was big into LEGO when I was a child, and I remember the sense of freedom and shear creativity when building my very own creations, no templates or shortcuts available, all my own work based on trial and error, this was the influence behind the LEGO border of my Sketchnote. As educators, I believe it is our responsibility to motivate our students to utilize methods that may not be comfortable for them, allowing them to fail and revise rather than using simple template-based programs. I tried to make the bridge in the middle of my Sketchnote a central focus, symbolizing the need for teachers to bridge the gap between the use of things like templates, worksheets and shortcuts, to inspiring students to follow their own paths to success, even if that means failing and revising multiple times. Reading this article made me realize the reason I am still quick to use templates, worksheets and shortcuts is because of my lack of knowledge in digital technologies. I look forward to learning more about how to creatively make various projects using digital tech., and expanding my knowledge so that I can one day ensure my students are taking on their work with the empowerment and cconfidence I fell it is my job to instil within them.

Not Yetness: A Critical Pedagogical Story

The Hybridpod Podcast emphasises the transition required in order to take our traditional systematic approach to education and integrate Critical Pedagogy. This does not require just an integration of technology. At this point in the 21st century technology has already been integrated in the classroom. This technology however has only been integrated around what the establishment believes is best practices. “If this is what was done previously, how do we reach those outcomes but with technology?” Amy Collier, the guest speaker on the podcast argues this is not the right way to approach education. She argues the point of stepping back from what we know to be best practices and practice ‘Not Yetness’. ‘Not Yetness’ is a practice of taking on the high risk of teaching what we do not quite understand yet in the chance that the student and the teacher embark on something truly extraordinary. The idea of best practices and specific outcomes taking away from the riskiness of education is fundamentally wrong. The education process is a risky one and with such high risk comes a greater chance for reward. Tenure and security are not the only important things in teaching. Amy explains how this integrates well with the idea of Critical Pedagogy because they both ask questions of the current education establishment. Education is not meant to be about specific and established outcomes derived by people of power who went to school 30 years ago. Education is about exploring the unknown, diving into different forums, asking critical questions, trying to answer big and important questions and taking a risk to try and have a truly enlightened educational experience. We as future teachers should not act as machines and try to program each student in the same exact way. When we do this, all we are left with is Credential Clones and we have what is known is a canned educational process. Each child is fed the same exact process and expected to meet the same exact objectives doing the same exact exercises. With this process, individuation is stripped from students. We as teachers should be encouraging a move out of the classroom and take fieldtrips to different forums to interact and see what the real world is like. Education is in a delicate state. New processes of teaching and learning are presenting themselves with the help of different technological forums. However, this raises some unpredictability in education but “what becomes unpredictable is incredible.”

#UWinDig

NOT YETNESS IS A-OKAY!- Anthony Pisciuneri

This multimedia reflection serves to emphasize the Hybrid Pedagogy Podcast with Amy Collier and the importance of critical pedagogy within a classroom setting.  It is important that educators understand that there is no “best practice” for teaching, especially in a world where technology is changing how we access, understand and deliver information.  Amy explains the importance of “not yetness” and how we must encourage teachers to be willing to grow and create new ways of reaching students using the present-day technology.  Uncertainty, risk and discomfort is okay—for it is what motivates us to keep searching for effective educational practices.  As a future educator, I value the importance of learning new skills and gaining information using multimodality platforms.  In addition, this inspires me to use these methods within a classroom setting and relate curriculum to student experiences through forms of substitution, augmentation, modification and perhaps redefinition, in order to delivery curriculum efficiently and with the utmost enthusiasm.

Link to Podcast is below

http://hybridpedagogy.org/questioning-learning/

I hope you enjoy this POWTOON video. The link of the video is listed below.

Enjoy,

Anthony Pisciuneri

 

Tagged , , , , , ,

Let’s Kill the Ghosts in the Modern Classroom!

I found Ashley Hinck’s article Digital Ghosts in the Modern Classroom to be a very thoughtful and relevant piece. Although it felt somewhat overwhelming for me, as someone who has really only ever used shortcut/template platforms, I was able to understand and even agree with her arguments. We expect digital technology to take education in new directions and help students develop new skills, but our cookie-cutter educational ways of the past are still looming over us and restricting the full potential that digital technology could bring to the table. Students have been trained to follow strict steps and believe that there is only one right answer. Therefore, students are accustomed to thinking that they are only successful if they can find that single right answer using the methods that they have been taught. There is little to no emphasis on the educational journey and learning from mistakes. These troublesome notions still haunt our current digital practices in education. Students are using websites where everything is laid out in a pre-set theme or template instead of experimenting, building, and creating from scratch by learning how to code, because coding is more complex and messier, so although it may be more valuable as an educational process, the end result won’t be as neat and tidy. Once again, we see where our priorities are. We need to reform these old ways and put the emphasis on the learning process! We need to kill the ghosts! By encouraging students to experiment and giving them license to make mistakes we can rid them of the notion that making mistakes, or “failing”, makes them failures.

My first instinct was to represent my response in a Sketchnote, but in the end, after a lot of back-and-forth, I chose to use Coggle. I felt that it was important for me to explore a new platform. I also felt that it would help me to be more in tune with the article if I used a template/drag-and-drop platform like the ones she talks about. I think in those senses, it was a successful choice. I learned a lot about a new platform whilst being able to experience a lot of the elements she spoke of in her article. Coggle was very limiting. Sure, it was fairly easy to use. A couple of clicks and some drag-and-drops were all I really needed to get by, but it was very limiting in terms of style and therefore caused me a lot of frustration and second-guessing. Should I just be doing this on paper? Should I just look for a platform like Paint, where I could have more freedom? Ultimately, I still feel like this allowed for a more authentic experience in relation to the article’s topic.

Originally, I set out to make a mind-map. In my head, this consisted of a web-like form with a center and multiple lines of thought branching out. What I found once I started, was that my “mind-map” was turning into more of a linear stream of consciousness. Hinck’s article really made me reflect on the roots of our education system. Digital technology facilitates student-centered learning, but our system still seems to be carrying its past traditions of teacher-centered learning and template teaching, where students have to find ways to conform to the lessons and teaching techniques presented to them, instead of those elements being tailored to them. I believe that if we can get to a place in education where the focus is completely on the individual student and their educational journey through experiential learning, then we will see more “complex” digital platforms being tackled in classrooms, but we first have to remove that fear of “failing” or being “wrong”.

Preview:

PDF of my Mind Map made on Coggle: Schoenberger Modern Classroom Ghosts Mind Map

Vicky Schoenberger

Embracing the Learning Process: A THREAD!

I chose the podcast with Collier and Friend because I found it extremely interesting after reading a brief synopsis on the contents. Collier’s points throughout the podcast made me reflect on not-yetness within my own learning experience and I noticed that in the past I have sometimes gotten caught up in the idea of education being a step-by-step process with only one answer. This may be due to a mix of teaching styles utilized by teachers and my own attitudes within the realm of various classes throughout my career as a student, but it is something that I needed to be exposed to earlier in my life. I definitely agree that the current education system forces students to focus solely on the end result, which causes them to become frustrated when they don’t get something right away. It is definitely important to help students understand that it is perfectly okay to make mistakes, especially when it is with something they are not completely familiar with at the time. If this idea can become ingrained into students’ minds by promoting the ideas of not-yetness and risk-taking, the learning process can become much more beneficial for future students. This podcast is something that I could have used much earlier in my schooling experience, but I am glad to have access to its contents now so adjustments can be made throughout the rest of my life.

I chose to do a Twitter thread because I feel it gives a nice mix of explanation through text and visual aids through GIFS. Sometimes it is harder to transmit ideas (especially more emotional ones) through text, so I felt as if this would be a good choice for my first blog post. One drawback of using Twitter as a platform for the assignment is that there is a character limit per tweet, which is obviously made easier by being able to make a thread of ideas, but sometimes there are certain ideas that I wanted to convey all within one tweet and was forced to make it into multiple ones. This was not a big problem; however, and I thoroughly enjoyed creating this Twitter thread as it was something I would recommend to anyone looking to try something different in their next assignment. Without further ado, enjoy my Twitter thread by clicking on the link below!

Is Good Pedagogy Really As Simple As X+Y ??

I selected the Hybrid podcast “Questioning Learning” by Chris Friend and Amy Collier to analyze and reflect upon. I used a platform that was challenging yet utilizing my artistic abilities and love for visual arts, a sketchnote. This sketchnote explores the true significance of “not-yetness”. This has been a great learning curve for me, as my perspective on standardized pedagogies has changed completely. Below you will find a picture of my sketchnote, but you can click here for a video that is better quality and easier to read! 

In this podcast, Amy touched on this notion of “not-yetness” and the need to ask questions about what we’re doing opposed to what are the best practices, as well as how to be more student-orientated. Through this sketchnote, I decided to show the importance of students to inquire about things, to take a risk and to deviate from the traditional school culture. Amy talked about a movement that envelops the shift from teaching to learning and how we want to be more learner-centred and based on student life- this is called the “learnification movement”.  This learnification movement has allowed us to make assumptions of different inequities, hiding questions like “what is education”, “for whom”, and “why do people go through it”. We don’t ask ourselves these questions because we are so consumed with only focusing on the learning aspect. Amongst all other things, this podcast also made me reflect on the meaning of the word “understand”. Can someone truly completely ever “understand” something? I came to the realization that we should not be using this word in a learning outcome because the depths of “understanding” is an ongoing process that takes time. Amy also touched on the concept of learning outcomes and its role in regards to students. I started thinking to myself…why are we as teachers not asking ourselves “what would make me shocked and admire my students, or maybe wonder at their work”. I believe that should be where teachers start when it comes to learning outcomes. This is a piece of mind that I am forever going to take with me going into schools. It is needless to say that all learning outcomes are different with every individual student, and they should not mean that every student will be taking the same route and ending with the same route. I’ve realized the more we are willing to embrace this risk that comes along with education, the more joy and meaning there will be. Amy said, “Risk is all around us and we have to be ready to not survive but thrive”. Students should feel that discomfort of not knowing and of everything not being best practice. 

I think Critical pedagogy is about asking students and teachers what makes them excited about learning, and we should take that and try to explore it, in order to create a more joyful and meaningful learning experience. There is so much more to education than just learning. When people come together, you would not believe what can be created. All of these aspects ties back to to the concept of not-yetness. It involves not satisfying every condition, not fully understanding something, not check-listing everything, not tidying everything, not trying to solve every problem…but creating space for emergence to take us to new and unpredictable places, to help us better understand the problems we are trying to solve.

The Ways We Can Improve our Teaching & Learning

The podcast entitled “Questioning Learning” with Chris Friend and Amy Collier was really interesting and beneficial for me. It has made me realize that online learning may not be the best way to have fair learning and there are some other options.

Schools always work on doing what’s fair. Fair is an aspect that needs to be taken serious. With the diversity around the world and schools, it is important not to choose favourites and make sure it is equal among the classroom. This podcast talks about just that and I agree with it 100%. The biggest struggle with fairness is online courses. They are encouraged for many students especially in university but what if the student has a learning disability? Will they be able to take the online course? Personally, I don’t think so. Online courses are designed to be the same for each and every student no matter the way you learn. I agree with the learning outcomes as well. How are you supposed to put each student on the same scale? Not every student will have the same results and be in the same place at the end. Instead of putting what they should understand, they should have questions at the end of the semester that should be able to be answered based on the work throughout the semester. I really enjoyed the podcast and agree with everything that was said.

Image result for fairness

The mind map I have created displays key points that were spoken about throughout the podcast. Online courses, understanding, learning outcomes and canned courses were the four topics that really stood out. Each one is designed with their own colour in order to understand the differences between each one. It is easily visible with the bigger titles and different colours. The few pictures add to it by putting some visuals. There are not many because I felt like it would be too busy and the words explain themselves.  Please visit the below link to see what the mind map was created looks like.

Mind Map – Questioning Learning

Where Does a Ghost go on Vacation? The Modern Classroom

Digital Ghosts in the Modern Classroom- Ashley Hinck

Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat, Youtube, etc. were the apps I immediately thought of when I heard the term “digital media” until I read Ashley Hinck’s article “Digital Ghosts in the Modern Classroom.” Ashley describes these templates and many others as short cuts that fail to facilitate our learning as young students. We aren’t set up to be creators or explorers of our own learning pertaining to the digital world because as students we are only exposed to these types of “drag-and-drop” shortcuts. The programs “Raspberry Pi” and “HTML coding” were completely foreign to me, it’s not that as students we are lazy and choose not to explore these programs but because our previous educators have always had the same style of teaching- multiple choice tests, step-by-step instructions, right or wrong answers- completely limiting our imagination and creativity. I am guilty of sticking to what I am familiar with especially when it comes to technology, which was evident when I chose to not use any of the computer programs, and instead, stuck to paper and coloured pencils to carry out this assignment. I am also guilty of feeling the frustration when I can’t figure out the correct answer or when there isn’t a specific way to figure out the correct answer because it’s a rare occurrence that I find myself in situations where this actually happens.

As future educators we need to encourage students to explore situations that make them uncomfortable. We need to teach the importance of trial and error through unstructured assignments and other ways to test their knowledge. It’s insulting to student’s intelligence to provide them with step-by-step instructions like reading skills is what they’re getting tested on. Digital making is unlike any other subject areas in the aspect of exploring endless possibilities and not always having a certain way to perform tasks. I believe the overall and underlying problem in students limited intellectual abilities stems from how the school’s shape our thinking. After reading this article, I intend to alter my teaching philosophy to create an environment for students that promotes open-endedness, discomfort in less familiar areas, and facilitate learning through exploration and creativity.

STOP Limiting Creativity NOW!

The article ‘Digital Ghosts in the Modern Classroom’ emphasizes the importance of moving students from users of shortcut websites and platforms to more open-ended and experimental users of technologies. When most students initially take courses on digital media they come in with the expectation of learning how to photo shop pictures and make YouTube videos, these assumptions come from their understanding of how school is suppose to work. Students learn through following a series of linear, standard steps which in the end counts towards the right answer. This assumption of right and wrong is affecting the way students learn. Most platforms that students use on a daily basis are things like Snapchat, Instagram and PowerPoint, which limit their creativity by taking away the ability to tweak filters or choose things like font and colour.  In order to move away from this form of thinking and learning we must help students see the limitations of shortcut websites and platforms, we need to give them permission to make mistakes and try and fail. Once they begin to see beyond the idea of “right answers” they can start to become full participants of their own creations.

As I read this article, I couldn’t help but realize I am also the kind of learner that is stuck in the same form of thinking as the students in this article. The only way I have ever used digital technology is through the template/shortcut platforms. You don’t really think of the way traditional school culture (worksheets, multiple choice) affect the way you learn, but after reading this article I realize how much these expectations affected the way I learn. I am hoping that by the end of this class, I can open my mind to a different process of creating and expand my technological knowledge.