Category Archives: (10) 5332

Collaborating: To Infinity & Beyond!

For this assignment, I chose to review the Collaborator Module of the Ontario Extend web site in the form of a Twitter essay. Although I use Twitter fairly often for work purposes, it was still slightly out of my comfort zone, as I am a visual, creative person, and as such, I felt summarizing what I read this time around proved to be more difficult, but as the module suggested, I stepped out of my comfort zone to try something new and really enjoyed it!

The Collaborator module itself is broken up into four sections, but I believe the main message and big idea to explore is that as educators, there are many different ways to build our PLN through collaborating with others and utilizing different multi-modal means, which in turn empowers and inspires us to grow and learn.

I particularly resonated with what Steven Johnson talked about in his video, “Where Good Ideas Come From.”

As someone who works in digital marketing, I am almost forced to generate new ideas daily that are creative and engaging. Often times I find myself developing these new ideas from past ideas that had not quite formed fully, but once I collaborate with other digital marketers, the other half of the missing puzzle seems to come together. I look at it like a maze: often times, we cannot find our way out, but with a little guidance and a push in the right direction from others, we can see the light at the end of the tunnel. The same concept can be applied as an educator; utilizing small hunches to build lesson plans and utilize your growing PLN to complete these lesson plans.

Speaking of growing a PLN, one of the greatest platforms to easily connect with others is through Twitter:

I found Professor Couros’ video to be the most interesting section of this module, as it offers educators a way to express their thoughts and collaborate with others in various multi-modal means; for example, I’ve used Twitter in the past to enhance my knowledge on digital analytics. As a visual learner, I was able to build my PLN of professionals in the field who shared videos, tutorials, and offered immediate assistance; all through limited characters because they saw those characters as something more than just words on a screen. This gave me the idea to utilize Twitter in the classroom with my own students for learning, as they can learn from other cultures and fellow students, just as I can.

Although Twitter is one medium to collaborate and enhance your PLN, it is not the only way. I particularly liked Howard Rheingold’s mention of cultivating a PLN. I’ve used his suggestions in the past to build my knowledge, through attending workshops, watching TED talks, collaborating in online groups with other educators, etc.

Although there are many ways to cultivate a PLN, I really agreed with Mary Wever on professional identity in your PLN.

I’ve chose to include some personal content on my professional pages, as I feel it helped build my PLN through understanding a little bit better of who I am behind the education and experience. Additionally, knowing some personal details about those in your network may help you step out of your own comfort zone and build a trust within your PLN. I know it sure has for me!

I loved the idea of using something like a mind-map to connect your PLN together. As a visual learner, this approach would greatly benefit me, AND I could adapt it to fit differentiated instruction (e.g. using speech or written forms instead of visual). The module also gave me a different perspective on collaboration (e.g. I never thought of collaborating to understand a different perspective from mine!), and how I may use it in my classroom to enhance not only my students learning, but mine as well.

Tagged ,

Collaboration: Guaranteed Satisfaction… I Promise.

In baseball, there is a mandatory rule, three strikes and you’re out; but three lucky strikes…. and you’re in. Right now you’re probably thinking “What does this have to do with collaboration?”, and the (obvious) logical explanation for that would be, I don’t know. Although I will tell you something I do know, and that is collaboration in the form of Personal Learning Networks (PLNs) are beneficial for your pedagogical practice. Now you’re probably thinking “How? What’s he talking about?”, well I’ll tell you all about it in the rest of this blog so bear with me. Get strapped on in, open your mind, hang loose, and let’s get ready to grind.

Canva infographic created by Troy Biskey illustrating the Collaborator Module.

The first thing you need to know is that PLN’s offer connections to various people or organizations where ideas, reflections, questions, and discussions can be made for learning purposes. While PLNs are not new, the platforms they are built on today have changed. Many teachers use social media to create their personalized, digital PLN.  It is also important to keep in mind that there are four elements when it comes to creating a PLN which include: Exploring, Engaging, Exploring and Empowering. Let’s learn more about these steps, shall we?

Canva image Step 1: EXPLORE: WHY COLLABORATE? Find out why in the next paragraph.

As a teacher candidate myself, I believe that outsourcing and researching topics to build my pedagogical practice is an excellent way to improve my own knowledge. I find that collaboration in terms of learning is a great way to improve knowledge, as well as having opportunities to teach others. Being open to collaboration is key to building a personal learning network (PLN), the aim is to broaden your network to include cross-disciplinary skills and insights. These online communities of practice generally have three main characteristics: 1. Domain: shared knowledge and skill within a focused area, 2. Community: individuals converging and learning together, 3. Practice: sharing strategies, tools, resources, and examples through a knowledge exchange. One of the absolute coolest things about PLN’s is that they can be more personal, built entirely by you. How wild is that? Pretty sick I would say. I hope I’m selling you on collaboration so far… STEP 2!

Upclose shot of the infographic on steps 2 and 3.

The next steps here are ENGAGE and EXTEND, the goals of which are to have others connect to you and you with them in order to share some new information with others, as well as getting your name out to the public. For me, I’ve found that I am interested in learning other people’s interests, especially when they have a passion for their teaching. With PLN’s you are able to control who sees your work, you can share your work in whatever way you choose to do so, and you have the option to observe other people’s work without having to comment. PLNs are also formed around the goal of learning. These modes of learning can be organized professionally or through personal interest, the overall goal of a PLN, however, is to help people learn about particular topics/subject areas. I’ll answer your burning question right now, I know you’re wondering “But does my PLN have to be professional?”. ABSOLUTELY NOT, you can construct it with your own interests to teach others about your hobbies and such. Incredible… just incredible. The overall goal of PLNs is to promote growth, development, and understanding in an area that is meaningful to you. The overarching theme of PLNs is that of Connectivism which is the theory that your network provides the context for your learning, not necessarily the content. Keepin’ up alright? Good, movin’ on.

Zoomed in and scrolled down on this infographic to reveal the final step: EMPOWER!

My God, we’ve reached it, the final step. Are you excited? You should be because I am. I can’t believe we made it this far together. Anyways the fourth thing to keep in mind is to Empower your PLN, you want to map it out strategically to the public. I will mention that your PLN can be in the form of various online platforms that are quite fun to use, some of which include: Twitter, YouTube, Google Drawing, Coggle, and The Educator’s PLN. Creating a visual diagram of the people, organizations, collectives, and others who are in your network makes for a strong looking PLN as well as an effective one. Again as a teacher candidate, I find that having these online platforms as an outlet to express my passion in a specific subject area of interest gets me excited to teach others, and hopefully, I can learn a thing or two from their PLN. It is also important to make note that a clean looking, well-organized PLN that highlights your specific nodes, targeted demographics, technologies you have used/don’t use, partners, etc.., will ensure for connection between various individuals and organizations you are trying to reach.

Gif to help bring this greasy post to a conclusion.

Well, that brings us to the end of the discussion on PLNs and how you can use them in your pedagogical practice. The possibilities for connection and collaboration with the use of PLNs are endless, and it is an excellent way to improve your learning. If I have taught you NOTHING from this entire post, then I will leave you with this… always let your steak rest at least 10 minutes after cooking and cut it against the grain. I’m glad we went on this journey together, I feel like we’ve grown.

Take an escalator down to the ole comment section, go down to the basement, leave your grievances, let me know what you’ve learned. Have an amazing day, don’t let your dreams be dreams, make a PLN, and most importantly, have a good one. Cheers!

Trendy or Evidence-Based Teaching Practice? How to Determine if Your Selection of Digital Technology Effectively Meets the Needs of Learners

While many trendy technology-based educational resources appear to be “groundbreaking” and “revolutionary” in meeting the needs of students, they do not always follow the appropriate steps to effectively “support, facilitate, and enrich” learning experiences. When you are seeking technological resources to meet the needs of students, you must be grounded in the appropriate information and tools to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these resources. Do not fall victim to the persuasive businessperson, who has not stepped inside of a classroom in years, claiming that their technological resource will transform the learning experiences in your classroom.

Making money is sometimes more of a priority for educational technology designers and marketers instead of meeting the needs of learners.

Thankfully there is a module, hosted by Ontario Extend, that can assist you in evaluating the effectiveness of these technological resources.

The module details a Design Think Process that can assist educators in evaluating the digital technology they introduce to their classroom

Extend’s technologist module is designed to assist educators in incorporating technological tools into their classrooms effectively to address specific challenges in learning. The module discusses four learning objectives for educators that apply to their selection, use, and integration of technological tools in the classroom in promotion of evidence-based practice. These steps must be considered before introducing technology into the classroom to address a specific need. Educators should  reflect on the digital literacies they have used for teaching, explore ways integrating technology in classrooms can address learner-centered challenges, use the SECTIONS framework to determine if a technological tool is effective for teaching and learning, and use a design-thinking approach to create a learning activity involving technology.

I have created an infographic that elaborates on the objectives of this module:

Infographic created on Canva

This infographic could be useful as a reference in many educational settings. Educators who plan to introduce new technological resources to their classrooms could review this infographic and verify that their process and product is aligned with the steps of effectively supporting the needs in classes through the use of their digital technology.

Consider the SECTIONS framework when selecting technology and media for your classroom

As a high school music teacher candidate, I have already applied these steps to evaluating the technological resources I have encountered in my own lesson planning. I have already collected some new technological tools for potential future lessons because they aligned with the learner-centered steps outlined by the module. For example, recording softwares and applications Audacity, GarageBand, and Voice Memo have the potential of enhancing learning experiences, as they include all elements of the SECTIONS framework. They provide multiple methods of differentiation and do not require personal data to be used at no cost. Specific collaborative assignments can encourage face-to-face networking in classrooms for students using these programs. The learning experiences involving these programs can be tailored to the needs of most students.

There are numerous considerations to be made when introducing technology to your classroom. Follow the appropriate steps and you will likely avoid excluding learners from enriching experiences in your classroom.

Tagged ,

Teaching and Learning: Are We Really Doing the Best We Can?

I listened to Chris Friend and Amy Collier’s conversation about Questioning Learning on the Hybrid Pedagogy Podcast. I found this to be a very interesting read, as it touched on many different aspects of teaching and learning. The concept of critical pedagogy is something I will keep in mind as I move forward with my teaching career. I want to be critical of what is thought to be “best practice”, to ensure that I am truly doing what is best for my students.

The idea of “not-yetness” and taking risks is another concept that really intrigued me. As a student, I have previously noticed myself being afraid to be wrong, and hesitant to take risks. However, I do understand that sometimes it is necessary to step out of your comfort zone to improve and grow as an individual.

Going forward as a teacher, I definitely want to create an environment where students may learn to take risks, and try new things, to experience self growth. There needs to be a balance between setting expectations, and allowing students some room to showcase their knowledge in different ways. Ultimately, each student has a unique set of abilities, and as teachers we must provide them with opportunities to show what they are capable of!

I decided to write a twitter essay because I was somewhat comfortable with this technology, however there was still an aspect of challenge. I actually found it to be more challenging than I anticipated! Since there were so many concepts brought up in the podcast, I found it difficult to choose the main points, keep it concise, and create a sense of flow from the first tweet to the last. 

My approach for this twitter essay was to summarize the podcast while incorporating some of my own thoughts along the way. I wanted to formulate the main ideas into a quick and easy read that anyone on twitter could understand. Of course, a few good GIFs always make a twitter thread more interesting! Incorporating these gifs and photos required creativity and a bit of searching to find what I was looking for. Overall, this was a great learning experience, and certainly opened my mind to some interesting concepts regarding teaching and learning. 

Tagged

Learning: How Often Do You Question It? Not Often Enough.

After listening to the podcast by Chris Friend and Amy Collier I came up with a sketchnote to summarize some of the important concepts highlighted in the show. This was my first time listening to a podcast and it was interesting to see how formal ideas were presented in an informal way.

One of the concepts that Friend and Collier discussed was the idea of ‘Best Practices’. Best practices are created by someone else and said to be the best idea for everyone in any situation. We must question who they are best for and what they really mean. Best Practices are something that I have generally taken at face value, I hadn’t thought about what negative repercussions they might hold. Instead of ‘Best Practices’ I believe we should have practices in place that cater to individuals and their needs. Often times when something is best for a majority, the minority suffers the most. In my own teaching I want to make sure that the best practices I have in place are ones individualized to the students I’m teaching. 

Another idea that was discussed on the podcast was that of “Notyetness”, embracing the discomfort of not knowing and playing with an idea without quite getting it yet. Noyetness is so important to a critical pedagogy because it takes away the burden of having the right answer, instead it embraces the process to the answer and showcases the creativity in finding the solution. I often times ask myself when working on something, “How can I do this the right way?” and then proceed to stress myself out thinking about all the wrong ways I could be doing it. Embracing notyetness means to embrace that unknown factor of learning. This idea actually reminded me of a concept I learned in another class about flow, it emphasized how you can achieve the most optimal flow when completing work if you have a balance between challenge and skill. Notyetness seems to be a part of that process for me, you can only achieve flow if you are working towards something that challenges you, and something that challenges you shouldn’t be something to which you already have a solution. 

Collier also touches on the idea of “Learnification” which is essentially individualizing education so the responsibility falls on the learner rather than the community. This student interest based learning was not something I had ever been introduced to before but initially hearing about the concept, it seemed intriguing to me. I liked the idea of students wanting to learn whatever they wanted to learn, this personalizes learning and sparks a passion for it as well. Instead of just following a set curriculum that might not meet the interests of some students, why not introduce teaching as a way that touches everyone? Throughout the podcast I also learned that this ideology is quite romanticized and takes away from the student/teacher relationship. Though I wish to personalize learning for my students, I also believe that a part of teaching is maintaining a relationship with your students where there is trust, respect, and consideration. Classrooms are meant to be communal places of learning where we interact and work with one another, but by individualizing education it merely becomes a self process and aspects of collaboration are lost. When I think about my own learning experiences, the best ones have been where there was room for self growth and discovery as well as ways to work with one another in order to achieve the best result. 

When we become so engrossed by these ‘Best Practices’ and forget to work through ‘Notyetness’ we can become obsessed with the outcome. Outcomes provide a way to derisk learning; when you set measurable outcomes for what students are supposed to know, you take away from the opportunity to measure students on their own individual learning, growth, and understanding. Whenever I start an assignment of any sort, my first step is to always look at the rubric and outlines and see exactly what is asked of me. In my own placement experiences I’ve found that many students do the same and it becomes a way to achieve the best mark rather than forming an interest or understanding. Instead of Outcomes, Collier thinks that we should have Beacons. These Beacons can be big questions that students ask themselves by the end of their learning instead of reductive and incremental outcomes. 

Overall, the points that Collier and Friend made in the podcast were those that I agreed with. It made me question certain ideals we have for learning and what they really mean and I believe it is this questioning that leads to better teaching. I chose to present the information in a sketchnote to challenge myself. I initially wanted to do the Twitter essay because I have an easier time writing words than drawing pictures but this assignment provided me with the opportunity to step out of my comfort zone. I struggled immensely creating the sketchnote and often wanted to give up and write the Twitter essay but I believe that the challenge helped me grow as an educator and really helped me to see how different forms of showing information can be helpful to students and for understanding. #UWinDig2020

Recipe Followers or True Creators?

Jay Maisonville

The following is my reflection on the 2018 article, “Digital Ghosts in the Modern Classroom” by Ashley Hinck. (http://hybridpedagogy.org/digital-ghosts-modern-classroom/)

In her article, American digital media professor Ashley Hinck describes university students starting her class expecting to complete digital media assignments by following instructions and using templates. Hinck suggests that digital media educators should encourage digital literacy instead by allowing students to become true digital media makers and to learn through trial and error.

(From https://search.creativecommons.org/photos/9887e8a2-8c0e-4db6-82ed-71d4c8b72374)

In the following clip, I examine her proposal of allowing students to be ‘creators’ and compare it to the traditional template-based ‘recipe’ style of instruction. Traditional recipe or template-style assessments dominated most of my own education, and though I still appreciate its use in some contexts—like larger classes, compulsory classes, and classes that do not demand much creativity—I support Hinck’s claim as a means to deepen the learning experience and to inspire students. Reflecting on my time both as a student and as an aspiring educator, I explore opportunities to bring the creator model beyond the university-level digital media realm before confessing to my rocky but slowly improving relationship with technology.

Looking back on this project, I understand that the content and delivery may have been better-suited to a video or a twitter essay. This is something I’ll keep in mind for my next media reflection. Working with some new tools and methods (voice recordings, timing and linking a PowerPoint, searching for appropriate images) was a little challenging but a valuable experience. This project also reminded me that a good old-fashioned Google search can offer priceless insight, that inevitable mistakes and frustrations can be easily worked through with the right attitude, and that technology is sometimes even more cooperative than expected.

And to clarify something I said toward the end of the clip: I assure you that I know, and always have known, what a telephone is. I should have specified that I related to Mr. Carson’s feelings while discovering other valuable technologies throughout my teenage years…including the GPS, the NHL app, Google slides, and the lowly toaster oven.

(From https://search.creativecommons.org/photos/62f2e03c-eedd-4eeb-a3f6-bc74effe3d10)

Reference:

Hinck, A. (2018, March 29). Digital Ghosts in the Modern Classroom. Retrieved from https://hybridpedagogy.org/digital-ghosts-modern-classroom/.

Learning, let’s make it modern!

I read Ashley Hinck’s Digital Ghosts in the Modern Classroom. http://hybridpedagogy.org/digital-ghosts-modern-classroom/

My opinion of the author’s main message is that the classroom is modern and we, as educators, need to take responsibility for creating a modern digital classroom. I interpreted that embracing and using digital technologies in the classroom is not as hard as possibly assumed, and it is a great option for learning. Educators need to debunk the assumptions and expectations of digital technologies. Digital technologies should be used to enhance the classroom to create a modern classroom. Educators need to lead by example and show their students how to use these technologies in ways that are best for them. Not every digital technology is going to suit each student and if students have the technical knowledge and understanding, they can use technologies that enhance their learning. These technologies should simply be another learning tool.

The text opened my eyes about how “old” technologies limit student’s creativity. Before reading this article, I did not see PowerPoints, for example, as limiting and controlling (of a student’s creative choices). I use PowerPoint often and I choose from the variety of themes they offer. This article made me ask myself, what would happen to my PowerPoint presentation if I was able to make all creative decisions, if I could make my own theme.

I am a classic example of a student who “all they know of digital making are the template/shortcut platforms that have enabled them to participate in digital culture up until this point” as described in the article. I enjoy assignments that provide a lot of structure and that translated into my digital technology use. I did not often explore digital technologies that put me in the role of the “creator”. As a musician, I am constantly expressing myself through my music. Why not apply that same creative freedom to other areas and embrace these digital technologies that give me that opportunity?

As I created my artifact, I connected with the recurring theme in the article that modern digital technologies make students great makers, creators, and speakers. I realized that as I was creating my sketchnote, I was in complete control; I was the creator. I was creating a product exactly the way I wanted to. I was not following a script of steps. I used the shapes, colours, fonts, etc. that made sense for my learning. I think a sketchnote was a great artifact for me to help me get my feet wet in digital technologies for a modern classroom. Students should be encouraged to learn through methods that work for them! As an educator, I will create a learning space where my students can take control and be creative in their learning.

GHOSTS: They’re real and are HAUNTING the classrooms!

Sketchnote by: Troy Biskey

For this assignment, I read Ashley Hinck’s article Digital Ghosts in the Modern Classroom http://hybridpedagogy.org/digital-ghosts-modern-classroom/. I found this article to be informative and intriguing, and she brought up some very interesting points about these “ghosts” that I never considered before. Coming into the classroom, students have a lack of knowledge when it comes to digital making because these students have been influenced by shortcuts and templates for many years of their schooling careers. These templates eliminate the need for creative expression and these students find some difficulty when it comes to using more complicated steps in creation.  

Closeup of Troy Biskey’s sketchnote

I agree with Ashley in that these shortcuts and templates that are given to students throughout the K-12 career (and sometimes past that) limit the ability to be creative and to “think outside the box”. I never considered that these templates and shortcuts almost train students in a way to rely on “drag-drop methods” and when it comes time to learn properly they become lost. I know from my personal experience I would use shortcuts all the time because they’re easier to use instead of making constant mistakes with the possibility of a non-working final product. I remember coming into university and using programs such as Final Cut Pro and Audacity that required a higher level of skill to use… and I was lacking those skills. I found it frustrating to use because I wanted an easy way to get a final working product, but now I can confidently say that I appreciate learning those skills as they will help me in the future and my teaching career ahead.

Illustration of a teacher banishing these “ghosts” who haunt the classroom

Although I do believe that shortcuts and templates are a large impact on creative student learning and experimentation, I also would consider that they do have their place in the classroom at times and can be a benefit. Ashley Hinck stated that students are held back by these shortcuts/templates, and that they can cause students to be weary or apprehensive about taking risks. These “ghosts” in a way diminish confidence in the students because making mistakes can be discouraging and I would agree with that, however, I believe that students have almost been trained to be scared because these “ghosts” haven’t been used to their most effective advantage. I would say that shortcuts/templates/multiple choice tests/fill in the blanks/etc… are used sometimes too often in the classroom which results in students relying on them for a “safety net” seeing as it’s easier to fall back on this net rather than go through a series of trial and error. I believe that limiting the use of these “ghosts” and integrating more trial and error learning would be more of a benefit in student’s learning, thus providing them a concrete foundation of more experiment based learning.  

Illustration of Troy Biskey’s sketchnote

Reading this article was informative and intruiging as I have stated before and I did agree with most of what Ashley Hinck said, although I would say that one of the hardest parts of the assignment would be creating an artifact in a creative way. This was the first sketchnote that I have ever made, I enjoyed making it but it was challenging. There was a lot of information given in this article and I found it a little difficult to orchestrate through mostly imagery but I wound up using some text in my sketchnote, perhaps a bit too much! If I were to try this again I would get rid of most of the text/sidenotes and would incorporate more dynamic imagery. I was also a little intimidated to try and take on the online infograph because I am horrible at using technology… but maybe next time I’ll step out of that comfort zone and give it a shot!

Creating a generation of Thinkers and Tinkers.

For my digital artifact I decided to make a Twitter essay, inspired by the main themes in Ashley Hinck’s article “Digital Ghosts in the Modern Classroom”.  In her article, Hinck says that “…all [her students] know of digital making are the template/shortcut platforms that have enabled them to participate in digital culture up until this point.” (Hinck) She continues to explain how these platforms not only effect how her students see technology, but school as well. They have become programmed to follow a set of tasks or steps that will inevitably bring them to the right answer.  

The problem with this mentality, Hinck continues is that it can “ limit openness and creativity.” (Hinck) She then gives the readers some solutions for breaking away from these rigid parameters and encourage their students to use loose technological platforms such as Scratch or Raspberry Pi to encourage them to explore a more CREATIVE PROCESS.  

This exploration of creativity through technology is the theme I focused on in my Twitter essay.  I wanted to explore the idea of using technology as a form of expression rather than a place to drag and drop ideas into a template that’s already been used by thousands of people.  Through this exploration, I decided to take Hinck’s advice, and I explored the loose technological platform called Scratch

A couple hours later, and with the help of the Scratch tutorials, I came up with this animation of my name.

Turns out Scratch has endless possibilities, I could have tinkered and explored with that program for hours.  Another great aspect I enjoyed about Scratch, was once our animation is uploaded there is an option for explaining my work in the “Notes”, and a “Comment” section for my peers or other Scratch users to give feedback.  What a great tool for exploring reflection in the classroom. Every student could have their own accounts, watch their final products and give feedback to their peers. 

In conclusion, Hinck’s article has sparked a desire in me to continue to explore other technological platforms, and to find more creative platforms for expressing my ideas and those of my future students.  Moving forward, if students are encouraged to use technology to their artistic advantages, I think we are looking at a very dynamic and promising future of students who are with thinkers and tinkers.

Tagged

Digital GhostBusting: The Future of Education

I read the article, “Digital Ghosts in the Modern Classroom”, written by Ashley Hinck. The article delves into how, in today’s classroom, with modern digital technology the different programs, applications, and software we have available to our students have the potential to actually limit student creativity. The article really changed my perspective on how technology shapes the minds of our students. It is pretty clear that our modern technology has opened numerous doors to prosper the learning of students. However, Hinck makes an interesting argument that the structure of simplicity that comes with using much of these digital technologies creates a certain mindset in students, that there is either a correct or incorrect method of approaching a task. The technologies are great, the implications on the mindset of students, not so great. This article has really opened my eyes as an educator to shy away from using step-by-step approaches in both my own teaching, as well as in student evaluations. Students should be encouraged to ride their own wave and think outside of the box when completing school-related tasks. Hopefully, this mindset will translate into their everyday lives as they grow into life-long learners!

Ride your own wave with your creative abilities.


Personally, my experience with using digital technology in the classroom has definitely been haunted by the “ghosts” which Hinck discusses. I can recall working through various assignments throughout both high school and university where I felt that there was only one correct way to complete a task. At times I struggled to figure out what was supposed to be done. In retrospect, some of these assignments were more about completing the task in a unique, creative fashion than completing it correctly. As a future educator, I think it is important to understand and implement ways to abolish these digital ghosts. As future educators, we are digital ghostbusters. Working with modern technology is not about discovering new means of allowing creativity to flow, instead, it is about using the technologies we do have to their fullest potential and flourishing creativity in that sense. In closing, while completing the current assignment I definitely felt some of the pressure of trying to do things “the right way”. I felt there was a strict process I should be following in order to complete the assignment. However, after contemplating the contents of the article, I realized that I was facing the exact digital ghosts that Hinck discussed. The assignment was designed for us to discover a new technology, tinker around with using it, and then find a creative way to portray our ideas about the article. With that said, here’s my twitter essay about the digital ghosts we face in the modern classroom. https://twitter.com/MrDiCarloTeach/status/1178853959831830528?s=20

Tagged