Author Archives: nguye135

Technology ‘of the people, by the people, for the people’

Embedded image of my infographic, titled, “Me, A Technologist?”

The infographic above was made using Canva. Ever since I learned about the platform, I wanted to experiment with its functions. For someone with little-to-no experience using editing software like Photoshop, Canva was a good step to explore my creativity. Creating this infographic was a healthy challenge for me and I think I will continue to use this platform for other projects.

This was the first time I had ever been introduced to the Extend Ontario modules for educators, and I was pleasantly surprised at its simple format and accessibility. Of course, what else can you expect of a site that aims to promote technological integration?

For this part of the course, I decided to explore the Technologist module in-depth. As a student, I was often taught using the traditional lecture-style method: teacher talks, words are on a board or a screen, and students copy. I found myself falling into the same pattern during my first practicum, so I wanted to use this opportunity and see if I could glean anything from the module for myself.

Boredom in the classroom, as illustrated by Spongebob

The main message I received from this module was that every step of a technology integration initiative should involve those affected by it. As I mention in the infographic, there are clear parallels between Extend Ontario’s definition of design thinking and student-centered practices. In other words, how teachers use technology in the classroom is intricately tied to constructivist views of teaching and learning. Because my own teaching beliefs are also centered on how students construct their own learning experiences, I found the module easy to follow.

Snippet of my infographic: design thinking is people thinking

The module pursues one design thinking process – empathize, design, ideate, prototype, and connect and test – but it is not the only pathway. An embedded link to UXBeginner.com describes several design thinking methodologies and their associated terms. The particular process used in the module places a strong emphasis on feedback and reflection at each of its five steps. If there is one thing I have learned so far during my time as a student teacher, it is that reflection is the cornerstone of personal and professional development. The Technologist module taps into this concept in a very practical way by including Extend Activities at the end of each design thinking step. Every stage is part of a work in progress, and educators should not expect perfection after a single try at technological integration.

An example Extend Activity from the ‘Ideate’ step

One thing I would like to see in included in the Technologist module is educator testimony about how the module has helped them. Similar to how different products and services include customer interviews in their promotions, anyone new to the world of technological integration may gain reassurance learning about the experience of those who have been through the wringer. Although the module includes embedded links to various digital collaboration platforms, such as a Learner Challenge Bank Padlet, using photos or a video provides a more personal connection.

Customer satisfaction, illustrated by Saturday Night Live

After all, making a personal connection is one of the key ingredients to a successful educational experience. This is why ‘people thinking’ is so important in the Technologist module and in all other aspects of classroom pedagogy.

Thanks for reading! Cheers to you, people educator.

What do we THINK about how we TEACH?

UPDATE: Please note that the reflection is based on the original Sketchnote. A new one has been posted based on suggested improvements. Original Sketchnote can be downloaded in the link below the new Sketchnote.

I listened to the HybridPod episode, “Questioning Learning”, with Chris Friend and Amy Collier. They discuss the idea of “not-yetness” and how it relates to Critical Digital Pedagogy, particularly how it counters over-structured online learning. I decided to use a Sketchnote to visualize the key ideas of this podcast.

New Sketchnote of the Questioning Learning podcast. Changes have been made to reflect comment suggestions.

Because a podcast is an aural medium, I thought a Sketchnote would help provide imagery while maintaining the flowing nature of a conversation. At first, I considered using an infographic, which also makes use of simplified graphics and words to make a point. However, I had specific pictures in mind when it came to this podcast, and websites like Canva were not able to provide exactly what I envisioned. Using a Sketchnote meant my images were only limited by my (meagre) artistic ability, not website functions and options. 

My struggle to draw
https://gph.is/2RyoSCD

One of the ideas I wanted to draw attention to is Amy’s concept of “not-yetness” and risk. Although it never occurred to me to view my own educational experiences from this perspective, I felt a strong connection once Amy and Chris elaborate on the idea. As a student, I often got caught up in what was the “right” answer and did not want to gamble with my marks. The wonder and awe that Collier mentions was forgotten. As an educator, I imagine it would be difficult to take professional risks as well. We can fall into the trap of teaching content as if it were items on a grocery list – check, they’ve learned this idea, check, they can explain this term. This is especially true for online courses, where, as Amy laments, “it is somehow okay” to over-structure the course.

I did my best to emphasize the idea of risk in the Sketchnote by using the same bright, red, font each time it appears. I wanted the word to stand out from surrounding text and pictures since it was one of the main ideas of the podcast.

An example of bold red “RISK” from the Sketchnote

Another topic of the podcast that stood out to me was the concept of asking questions. Right off the bat, Amy explains critical pedagogy as something which “encourages us to ask questions about what we’re doing, to not make assumptions…” Although it is not mentioned explicitly, asking questions of ourselves as educators is an aspect of personal reflection. From an academic, I am sure my fellow classmates can agree that reflection has been impressed upon us from Day 1. If we do not take time to step back and think about what we are teaching, how we are teaching it, and why we are teaching it, our methods can get stale and we lose the ability to inspire our students.

How students feel after a stale class period
https://gph.is/g/ZYG2gpE

Of course, education is not just about teachers asking questions of themselves. Amy also talks about spurring students to ask questions about what they’re learning. She goes as far as to suggest that learning outcomes could be big questions we want students to ask themselves, or beacons. This sounds like something I would want to implement in my own classroom. It would encourage students to interact with what they learn rather than be passive receivers of information, and would make for good review questions before a test.

Since asking questions is such an integral part of Critical Digital Pedagogy, I thought it would be a good idea to formulate my Sketchnote title and topic transitions into questions. I hope they serve as their own little beacons as you go through the note!  

An example of a Sketchnote beacon

Tagged